Positron emission tomography using [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predictthe pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy

Citation
Ic. Smith et al., Positron emission tomography using [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predictthe pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy, J CL ONCOL, 18(8), 2000, pp. 1676-1688
Citations number
74
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
0732183X → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1676 - 1688
Database
ISI
SICI code
0732-183X(200004)18:8<1676:PETU[T>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose ([F-18]-FDG) pos itron emission tomography (PET) can predict the pathologic response of prim ary and metastatic breast cancer to chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Thirty patients with noninflammatory, large (> 3 cm), or locally advanced breast cancers received eight doses of primary chemoth erapy. Dynamic PET imaging was performed immediately before the first, seco nd, and fifth doses and after the last dose of treatment. Primary tumors an d involved axillary lymph nodes were identified, and the [F-18]-FDG uptake values were calculated (expressed as semiquantitative dose uptake ratio [DU R] and influx constant [K]). Pathologic response was determined after chemo therapy by evaluation of surgical resection specimens. Results: Thirty-one primary breast lesions were identified. The mean pretre atment DUR values of the eight lesions that achieved a complete microscopic pathologic response were significantly (P = .037) higher than those from l ess responsive lesions. The mean reduction in DUR after the first pulse of; chemotherapy was significantly greater in lesions that achieved a partial (P = .013), complete macroscopic (P = .003), or complete microscopic (P = . 001) pathologic response. PET after a single pulse of chemotherapy was able to predict complete pathologic response with a sensitivity of 90% and ct s pecificity of 74%. Eleven patients had pathologic evidence of lymph node me tastases. Mean pretreatment DUR values in the metastatic lesions that respo nded did not differ significantly from those that failed to respond (P = .0 76). However, mean pretreatment K values were significantly higher in ultim ately responsive cancers (P = .037). The mean change in DUR and K after the first pulse of chemotherapy war significantly greater in responding lesion s [DUR, P = .038; K, P = .012). Conclusion: [F-18]-FDG PET imaging of primary and metastatic breast cancer after a single pulse of chemotherapy may be of value in the prediction of p athologic treatment response. J Clin Oncol 18:1676-1688, (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncolog y.