A study comparing the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of triamcinolone acetonide HFA-134a metered-dose inhaler and budesonide dry-powder inhaler following inhalation administration
D. Argenti et al., A study comparing the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of triamcinolone acetonide HFA-134a metered-dose inhaler and budesonide dry-powder inhaler following inhalation administration, J CLIN PHAR, 40(5), 2000, pp. 516-526
The impending phaseout of chlorofluorocarbons as propellants in pressurized
metered-dose inhalers used in the treatment of asthma has resulted in the
development of alternative devices to deliver drug to the pulmonary airways
. These alternative devices include metered-dose inhalers using environment
ally friendly hydroflurocarbon propellants and breath-actuated dry-powder i
nhalers. The purpose of this study was to compare the single- and multiple-
dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of a newly develo
ped hydroflurocarbon formulation of triamcinolone acetonide (Azmacort(R) HF
A 225 mcg Inhalation Aerosol) to that of the dry-powder formulation of bude
sonide (Pulmicort(R) Turbuhaler 200 mcg). This three-way crossover study us
ed I 6 normal healthy subjects each receiving a 675 meg dose of triamcinolo
ne acetonide, 600 meg dose of budesonide, or placebo twice a day for 5 days
. Serial plasma samples were collected after the first and last dose of tes
t medication for pharmacokinetic analysis. Pharmacodynamics were assessed b
y changes in hypothalamic-pituitory-adrenal axis function as measured by 8
a.m. serum cortisol, 24-fiour overnight serum cortisol AUC((0.24)) and 24-h
our urinary-free cortisol after the last evening dose of test drug. Tolerab
ility was assessed through physical examinations, vital signs, 12-lead EGG,
routine clinical labs, and adverse events recording. Both compounds were s
ystemically absorbed. However, no significant drug accumulation was noted w
ith chronic dosing. Chronic dosing did result in a statistically significan
t 20% reduction in basal 24-hour serum cortisol AUC((0.24)) for both compou
nds. There were no clinically significant abnormalities in physical examina
tion, vital signs, 12-lead EGG, or routine clinical labs noted during the s
tudy. Overall, the study drugs were well tolerated, with adverse events cha
racterized as mild to moderate in severity. (C) 2000 the American College o
f Clinical Pharmacology.