Ml. Bongers et al., Is balloon ablation as effective as endometrial electroresection in the treatment of menorrhagia?, J LAP ADV A, 10(2), 2000, pp. 85-92
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A
Background: Hot-fluid balloon therapy is a recently introduced, relatively
simple endometrial ablation procedure for menorrhagia. Because it is though
t to be safer than other ablation procedures, it would be superior to other
types of ablation if it is equally effective. The purpose of the present s
tudy was therefore to compare the safety and effectiveness of balloon ablat
ion and transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) for the treatment
of menorrhagia.
Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study comparing TCR
E and hot-fluid balloon ablation in consecutive patients suffering from men
orraghia and not responding to medical treatment. Between 1992 and 1994, al
l patients had TCRE, whereas from 1995 onward, all patients had balloon the
rapy. Outcome measures were surgical reintervention, menstrual pattern, and
patient satisfaction. Assuming a 9% reintervention rate after TCRE, a seri
es of 150 patients was required to show balloon ablation to be equally effe
ctive.
Results: Of the 152 patients who were included, 75 underwent TCRE and 77 ha
d balloon ablation. The procedure had to be abandoned in 13 patients in the
TCRE group (17%) and in 8 patients in the balloon ablation group (10%). In
the TCRE group, four patients underwent a second resection, whereas hyster
ectomy was performed in 15 patients (3-year cumulative reintervention rate
26%). In the balloon-ablation group, there were no reresections, whereas hy
sterectomy was performed in 9 patients (3-year cumulative reintervention ra
te 13%) (log-rank test P = 0.11). The relative risk for any reintervention
was 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.05-2.5). At 3 months' followup the dura
tion of menstruation was significantly shorter after TCRE than after balloo
n ablation, but at 6, 12, and 24 months, the duration of menstruation in th
e two groups appeared to be equal. No difference in patient satisfaction co
uld be detected between the two groups, but there appeared to be a statisti
cally significant decline in patient satisfaction over time for both therap
ies. This decline was stronger after TCRE than after balloon ablation.
Conclusions: Because endometrial ablation with a hot-fluid balloon seems to
be as effective as endometrial resection, with a lower complication rate,
balloon ablation might become the procedure of choice for endometrial ablat
ion.