Jh. Martin et al., Differential effects of deep cerebellar nuclei inactivation on reaching and adaptive control, J NEUROPHYS, 83(4), 2000, pp. 1886-1899
This study examined the effects of selective inactivation of the cerebellar
nuclei in the cat on the control of multijoint trajectories and trajectory
adaptation to avoid obstacles. Animals were restrained in a hammock and tr
ained to perform a prehension task in which they reached to grasp a small c
ube of meat from a narrow food well. To examine trajectory adaptation, reac
hing was obstructed by placing a horizontal bar in the Limb's path. Inactiv
ation was produced by microinjection of the GABA agonist muscimol (0.25-1.0
mu g in 1 mu L saline). Fastigial nucleus inactivation produced a severe i
mpairment in balance and in head and trunk control but no effect on reachin
g and grasping. Dentate inactivation slowed movements significantly and pro
duced a significant increase in tip path curvature but did not impair reach
ing and grasping. Selective inactivation of the anterior and posterior inte
rpositus nuclei did not impair grasping but severely decreased the accuracy
of reaching movements and produced different biases in wrist and paw paths
. Anterior interpositus inactivation produced movement slowing (wrist speed
) and under-reaching to the food well. Wrist and tip paths showed anterior
biases and became more curved. Also animals could no longer make anticipato
ry adjustments in limb kinematics to avoid obstructions but sensory-evoked
corrective responses were preserved. Posterior interpositus inactivation pr
oduced a significant increase in wrist speed and overreaching. Wrist and ti
p paths showed a posterior bias and became more curved, although in a diffe
rent way than during anterior interpositus inactivation. Posterior interpos
itus inactivation did not impair trajectory adaptation to reach over the ob
stacle. During inactivation of either interpositus nucleus, all measures of
kinematic temporal and spatial variability increased with somewhat greater
effects being produced by anterior interpositus inactivation. We discuss o
ur results in relation to the hypothesis that anterior and posterior interp
ositus have different roles in trajectory control, related possibly to feed
-forward use of cutaneous and proprioceptive inputs, respectively. The loss
of adaptive reprogramming during anterior interpositus inactivation furthe
r suggests a role in motor learning. Comparison with results from our earli
er motor cortical study shows that the distinctive impairments produced by
inactivation of these two nuclei are similar to those produced by selective
inactivation of different zones in the forelimb area of rostral motor cort
ex. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that there are separate
functional output channels from the anterior and posterior interpositus nu
clei to rostral motor cortex for distinct aspects of trajectory control and
, from anterior interpositus alone, for trajectory adaptation.