Effects of cannabinoid receptor agonist and antagonist ligands on production of inflammatory cytokines and anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 in endotoxemic mice
Sr. Smith et al., Effects of cannabinoid receptor agonist and antagonist ligands on production of inflammatory cytokines and anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 in endotoxemic mice, J PHARM EXP, 293(1), 2000, pp. 136-150
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Previous studies have shown that mice primed with Corynebacterium parvum pr
oduce higher levels of inflammatory cytokines than unprimed mice upon chall
enge with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Herein, we describe experiments in whic
h two cannabinoid (CB) agonists, WIN 55212-2 {(R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl
-3-[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthyl)
methanone} and HU-210 [(-)-11-hydroxy-Delta 8 tetrahydrocannabinol-dimethyl
heptyl], were examined for their effects on LPS-induced cytokines in C. par
vum-primed and unprimed mice. These agonists have been reported to bind sel
ectively to the CB2 and CBI receptor subtypes, respectively. WIN 55212-2 (3
.1-50 mg/kg i.p.) and HU-210 [(0.05-0.4 mg/kg i.p.) decreased serum tumor n
ecrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-12 (IL-12) and increased IL-10 when ad
ministered to mice before LPS. The drugs also protected C. parvum mice (but
not unprimed mice) against the lethal effects of LPS. The protection affor
ded to C. parvum mice could not be attributed to the higher levels of IL-10
present in these mice after agonist treatment. The WIN 55212-2- and HU-210
-mediated changes in the responsiveness of mice to LPS were antagonized by
SR141716A [N-(piperdin -1-yl)-5-(4-chloropheny)-1- (2,4-dichloropheny)-4-me
thyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride], a selective CB1 receptor ant
agonist, but not by SR144528 {N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]hep
tan-2-y]5-(4-choro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)pyrazole-3 carboxamide
}, a selective antagonist at the CB2 receptor. Therefore, both CB agonists
modulated LPS responses through the CB1 receptor. Surprisingly, SR141716A i
tself modulated cytokine responses in a manner identical with that of WIN 5
5212-2 and HU-210 when administered atone to mice. The agonist-like effects
of SR141716A, which were more striking in unprimed than in primed mice, su
ggested that the antagonist also could function as a partial agonist at the
CBI receptor. Our findings indicate a role for the CB1 receptor subtype in
cytokine modulation by CB ligands.