H. Faller et al., DO PSYCHOLOGICAL-FACTORS INFLUENCE SURVIV AL IN CANCER-PATIENTS .2. FINDINGS OF AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY WITH LUNG-CANCER PATIENTS, PPmP. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie, 47(6), 1997, pp. 206-218
The present prospective test study of hypotheses addressed the questio
n whether psychological factors are predictive of survival time in lun
g cancer patients. The hypotheses were: Emotional distress, depression
and depressive coping are associated with shorter survival; hope and
active coping with longer survival. The study was based on a sample of
n = 103 patients who were investigated post-diagnosis and before the
beginning of primary treatment. Emotional distress and hope were asses
sed by clinical scales (self-reports and interviewer ratings), depress
ion by the Depression Scale of von Zerssen, depressive coping and acti
ve coping by the Freiburg Questionnaire on Coping with Illness by Muth
ny. At follow-up, which took place three to five years later, n = 74 p
atients had died, for n = 29 patients the survival data are censored.
The prediction of the survival time was performed applying multivariat
e analyses (Kaplan-Meier-method, Cox-Regression), adjusting for biolog
ical risk factors (histological classification, stage of the disease,
type and amount of treatment, karnofsky performance status, age). Resu
lts were as follows: Active coping and hope were associated with longe
r survival, emotional distress, depression and depressive coping with
shorter survival, respectively. These associations were found consiste
ntly across assessment methods. The predictive effects of coping and d
istress were statistically independent of the influence of the somatic
risk factors. The best psychological predictor was the interviewer ra
ting of active coping. Its predictive power equalled that of the Karno
fsky performance status. However, there was evidence that the effects
of the psychological factors varied somewhat in interaction with treat
ment modalities. The findings are discussed from a methodological pers
pective. Possible causal models and mechanisms are presented which cou
ld account for interactions of psychological measures and the course o
f the disease: Thus, it can be conceived that psychological effects we
re mediated by patients' compliance with medical treatment. In additio
n, it cannot be ruled out that psychological factors themselves were i
nfluenced by the physical status of the patients at the time of entry
to the study.