State-level accountability for the performance of students with disabilities: Five years of change?

Citation
Jl. Elliott et al., State-level accountability for the performance of students with disabilities: Five years of change?, J SPEC EDUC, 34(1), 2000, pp. 39-47
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Education
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION
ISSN journal
00224669 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
39 - 47
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4669(200021)34:1<39:SAFTPO>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Along with the dramatic expansion of assessment activities during this deca de, there has been increased use of state-level assessments as accountabili ty tools. The extent to which students with disabilities have been included in state-level accountability, however, is questionable. This study examin ed changes that have taken place over 5 years in four aspects of state acco untability practices involving students with disabilities: (a) the number o f states using data on students with disabilities for state-level accountab ility and the nature of their accountability systems, (b) the existence of state policies on allowable accommodations and adaptations in assessments, (c) information on the rates of participation of students with disabilities in state-level assessments, and (d) the availability of data on students w ith disabilities in state-level accountability systems. Information was col lected from all 50 states, plus the 9 educational units whose special educa tion students were supported by the U.S. Office of Special Education Progra ms (e.g., Bureau of Indian Affairs, District of Columbia, Marshall Islands, Puerto Rico) in both 1991 and 1995. The results indicated that there have been dramatic increases in the number of states that indicate they use data from students with disabilities on school participation, exit, and achieve ment in their state accountability systems and in the number of states with written guidelines on the use of accommodations in state assessments. In c ontrast, states seem to have changed little in their specific knowledge abo ut the participation rates of students with disabilities in assessments, al though it appears that, when students are included in assessments, their da ta now are more likely to be accessible than 5 years ago. The implications of these findings for future efforts to include students with disabilities in state accountability systems are explored.