Generalizations in teacher education - Seductive and misleading

Citation
Dh. Gitomer et As. Latham, Generalizations in teacher education - Seductive and misleading, J TEACH EDU, 51(3), 2000, pp. 215-220
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Education
Journal title
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION
ISSN journal
00224871 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
215 - 220
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4871(200005/06)51:3<215:GITE-S>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
The authors contend that the temptation to generalize about the problems an d potential solutions facing teacher education are often simplified to the point of being misleading. Sensible policy decisions based on research find ings require that attention be given to the complex profile of supply and d emand and teacher ability; these issues should be explored in consideration of local demand and specific con tent-area needs. The authors posit that t he academic ability of teachers is not adequately characterized by broad ge neralizations; teachers who achieve licensure in specific con tent areas ap pear to have much stronger academic profiles than those who achieve element ary, physical, and spe cial education licenses. The mere act of raising pas sing standards for teacher licensure tests will not achieve desired effects unless serious attention is given to the recruitment and retention of high ly qualified candidates, with particular emphasis on actions necessary to d evelop a demographically diverse teaching force.