Background: The "Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm" (SITA) is a new t
echnique minimizing test time without reduction of data quality. In this re
trospective study we compared visual fields assessed with the conventional
full-threshold technique with those by SITA and analyzed qualitative and qu
antitative differences and the test time reduction of SITA.
Patients and Methods: 113 eyes with different glaucomatous field damage of
66 patients aged from 22 to 89 years were included. The patients underwent
perimetry with each strategy within four months. Exclusion criteria were ey
es with progressing glaucomatous damage and high rate of false-positive res
ults or artifacts by corrective glasses.
Results: The qualitative differences of the analysis were small: full thres
hold demonstrated more relative scotomas in eyes with normal SITA readings,
whereas scotomas assessed with SITA were often pronounced to absolute scot
omas. Average time reduction by SITA was 40% and depended on the severity o
f glaucomatous stage. No reduction was found for advanced glaucoma, whereas
normal fields using SITA were performed in half of the time of full thresh
old strategy.
Conclusion: Differences of SITA to conventional full threshold testing may
be related to fatigue effects of full threshold strategy due to longer test
time. The reduction of test time enables more motivation for more frequent
visual field examinations and thus a better detection of early glaucoma or
progressing visual field damage.