Background The best treatment (steroids, irradiation, or both) for moderate
ly severe Graves' orbitopathy, a self-limiting disease is not known. We tes
ted the efficacy of external beam irradiation compared with sham-irradiatio
n.
Methods In a double-blind randomised clinical trial, 30 patients with moder
ately severe Graves' orbitopathy had radiotherapy (20 Gy in ten fractions),
and 30 were assigned sham-irradiation (ten fractions of 0 Gy). Treatment o
utcome was measured qualitatively by changes in major and minor criteria an
d quantitatively in several ophthalmic and other variables, such as eyelid
aperture, proptosis, eye movements, subjective eye score, and clinical-acti
vity score at 24 weeks.
Findings The qualitative treatment outcome was successful in 18 of 30 (60%)
irradiated patients versus nine of 29 (31%) sham-irradiated patients at we
ek 24 (relative risk [RR]=1.9 [95% CI 1.0-3.6], p=0.04). This difference wa
s caused by improvements in diplopia grade, but not by reduction of proptos
is, nor of eyelid swelling. Quantitatively, elevation improved significantl
y in the radiotherapy group, whereas all other variables remained unchanged
. The field of binocular single vision was enlarged in 11 of 17 patients af
ter irradiation compared with two of 15 after sham-irradiation. Nevertheles
s, only 25% of the irradiated patients were spared from additional strabism
us surgery.
Interpretation In these patients with moderately severe Graves' orbitopathy
, radiotherapy should be used only to treat motility impairment.