B. Hersoug et P. Holm, Change without redistribution: an institutional perspective on South Africa's new fisheries policy, MAR POLICY, 24(3), 2000, pp. 221-231
In 1994 the new South African government started a policy process in the fi
sheries sector. It was acknowledged that although the fisheries resources w
ere reasonably well managed, the distribution of wealth and power within th
e fisheries was extremely uneven in favour of a few white-owned companies.
A large national commission (FPDC) with members from all stakeholders worke
d out recommendations that later were turned into a White Paper and eventua
lly into a new fisheries act. South Africa's new fisheries policy is based
on a modified ITQ system, which to a large degree accommodates existing own
ers. New entrants have been offered a small part of the available resources
and some state support in a transitional period - a result falling far sho
rt of the expectations of the formerly dispossessed groups. Our key concern
is to explain why institutions, in this case fisheries management institut
ions, change so slowly, even in a "revolutionary" context. The evident para
dox in the case of South Africa is that the state, which was supposed to re
present "the solution" in terms of a new and more equitable fisheries polic
y has turned into being "the problem". (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All r
ights reserved.