Although exceptional performance is a defining attribute of expertise, expe
rts sometimes exhibit striking errors and performance limitations. This art
icle reports two experiments in which experts predicted the spread of bush
fires, a domain characterized by complex but well-understood physical dynam
ics. Although accuracy was typically high, large errors were observed when
two primary predictor variables were in opposition. In a second study, the
experts' behavior-in contrast to that of novices-was additionally shown to
depend on problem context. In one context, experts again committed errors,
whereas in another, equally domain-relevant context, the correct prediction
s were made. Critically, when comparing performance across contexts, comple
tely opposing predictions were made under identical physical conditions. We
therefore suggest that expertise may comprise separate, and sometimes even
mutually exclusive, components of knowledge.