Objective: To compare the structure and function of the urethral sphincter
and the urethral support in nulliparous black and white women.
Methods: Eighteen black women (mean age 28.1 years) and 17 white women (mea
n age 31.3 pears) completed this cross-sectional study. The following asses
sments were made: urethral function using multichannel cystometrics and ure
thral pressure profilometry, pelvic muscle strength using an instrumented s
peculum, urethral mobility using the cotton-swab test and perineal ultrasou
nd, and pelvic muscle hulk using magnetic resonance imaging.
Results: Black women demonstrated a 29% higher average urethral closure pre
ssure during a maximum pelvic muscle contraction (154 cm H2O versus 119 cm
H2O in the white subjects; P = .008). Although not statistically significan
t, black women had a 14% higher maximum urethral closure pressure at rest (
108 cm H2O versus 95 cm H2O; P = .23) and a 21% larger urethral volume (481
8 mm(3) versus 3977 mm(3); P = .06). In addition, there was a 36% greater v
esical neck mobility measured with the cotton-swab test (blacks 49 degrees
versus whites 36 degrees; P = .02) and a 42% difference in ultrasonically m
easured vesical neck mobility during a maximum Valsalva effort (blacks = -1
7 mm versus whites -12 mm; P = .08).
Conclusion: Functional and morphologic differences exist in the urethral sp
hincteric and support system of nulliparous black and white women. (C) 2000
by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.