Racial differences in the structure and function of the stress urinary continence mechanism

Citation
D. Howard et al., Racial differences in the structure and function of the stress urinary continence mechanism, OBSTET GYN, 95(5), 2000, pp. 713-717
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00297844 → ACNP
Volume
95
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
713 - 717
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-7844(200005)95:5<713:RDITSA>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objective: To compare the structure and function of the urethral sphincter and the urethral support in nulliparous black and white women. Methods: Eighteen black women (mean age 28.1 years) and 17 white women (mea n age 31.3 pears) completed this cross-sectional study. The following asses sments were made: urethral function using multichannel cystometrics and ure thral pressure profilometry, pelvic muscle strength using an instrumented s peculum, urethral mobility using the cotton-swab test and perineal ultrasou nd, and pelvic muscle hulk using magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Black women demonstrated a 29% higher average urethral closure pre ssure during a maximum pelvic muscle contraction (154 cm H2O versus 119 cm H2O in the white subjects; P = .008). Although not statistically significan t, black women had a 14% higher maximum urethral closure pressure at rest ( 108 cm H2O versus 95 cm H2O; P = .23) and a 21% larger urethral volume (481 8 mm(3) versus 3977 mm(3); P = .06). In addition, there was a 36% greater v esical neck mobility measured with the cotton-swab test (blacks 49 degrees versus whites 36 degrees; P = .02) and a 42% difference in ultrasonically m easured vesical neck mobility during a maximum Valsalva effort (blacks = -1 7 mm versus whites -12 mm; P = .08). Conclusion: Functional and morphologic differences exist in the urethral sp hincteric and support system of nulliparous black and white women. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.