MOST SHUNT-DEPENDENT HYDROCEPHALIC patients present with predictable s
ymptoms of headache and mental status changes when their cerebrospinal
fluid shunts malfunction. Their intracranial pressure (ICP) is usuall
y high, and they usually respond to routine shunt revision. This repor
t describes 12 shunted patients who were admitted with the full-blown
hydrocephalic syndrome but with low to low-normal ICP. All 12 patients
had been maintained previously on medium-pressure shunts. Their sympt
oms included headache, lethargy, obtundation, and cranial neuropathies
. At peak symptoms, their ventricular sizes were large (ventricular/bi
parietal ratio of 0.35 to 0.45) in six and massive (ventricular/bipari
etal ratio >0.45) in six and their ICPs ranged from 2.2 to 6.6 mm Hg,
with a mean of 4.4 +/- 1.3 mm Hg (+/-standard deviation), i.e., below
or well within the pressure range of their shunts. The pressure volume
index of three patients at peak symptoms ranged from 39.2 to 48.5 ml,
with a mean of 43.9 +/- 4.6 ml, which represents a 190% increase from
the predicted normal value. Seven patients failed to improve with mul
tiple shunt revisions, including the use of low-pressure valves. In 11
patients, symptoms and ventriculomegaly were not reversed except with
prolonged external ventricular drainage at subzero pressures (mean ex
ternal ventricular drainage nadir pressure of -5.7 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, for
a mean period of 22.2 days). During external ventricular drainage trea
tment, symptoms correlated only with ventricular size and not with ICP
. AH 11 were subsequently treated successfully with a new medium- or l
ow-pressure shunt. One patient was treated successfully with prolonged
shunt pumping. We postulate that: 1) the development of this low-pres
sure hydrocephalic state is related to alteration of the viscoelastic
modulus of the brain, secondary to expulsion of extracellular water fr
om the brain parenchyma, and to structural changes in brain tissues du
e to prolonged overstretching; 2) certain patients are susceptible to
developing low-pressure hydrocepha!ic state because of an innate low b
rain elasticity due to bioatrophic changes; 3) low-pressure hydrocepha
lic state symptoms are due not to pressure changes but to brain tissue
distortion and cortical ischemia secondary to severe ventricular dist
ortion and elevated radial compressive stresses within the brain; and
4) treatment must be directed toward allowing the entry of water into
the brain parenchyma and the restoration of baseline brain viscoelasti
city.