Vs. Lee et al., Hepatic MR imaging with a dynamic contrast-enhanced isotropic volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination: Feasibility, reproducibility, and technical quality, RADIOLOGY, 215(2), 2000, pp. 365-372
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, reproducibility, and technical qualit
y of a dynamic contrast material-enhanced isotropic three-dimensional (3D)
volumetric interpolated breath-hold hepatic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging
examination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent 3D spoiled gradient-echo im
aging (4.2/1.8 [repetition time msec/echo time msec]; flip angle, 12 degree
s; interpolation in three directions; intermittent fat saturation; pixel si
ze less than or equal to 2.5 mm in all dimensions) before and dynamically a
fter administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine, with the first enhanced a
cquisition timed for hepatic arterial dominance by using a test bolus of co
ntrast material. Qualitative and quantitative measures of image quality wer
e determined. Patterns of arterial and venous anatomy were assessed. Ten pa
tients (20%) underwent repeat imaging within 6 months, and reproducibility
was evaluated.
RESULTS: Hepatic contrast-to-noise ratios for nonenhanced and arterial, por
tal venous, and equilibrium phase studies averaged 13.0 +/- 12.6 (SD), 17.4
+/- 11.8, 30.4 +/- 16.2, and 28.6 +/- 21.1, respectively. During arterial
phase, the liver enhanced a mean of 29% of the maximal enhancement as measu
red during portal Venous phase: Hepatic vascular anatomic variants were com
parable in distribution to those cited in published articles. Repeat studie
s were not significantly different in image quality when compared with orig
inal studies.
CONCLUSION: High-quality arterial phase 3D volumetric interpolated breath-h
old images can be obtained reliably and reproducibly when timed by using a
test dose of contrast material.