T. Seferlis et al., Cost-minimisation analysis of three conservative treatment programmes in 180 patients sick-listed for acute low-back pain, SC J PRIM H, 18(1), 2000, pp. 53-57
Objective - To perform st cost-minimization analysis of three conservative
treatment regimes for acute low-back pain (LBP).
Design - A prospective randomized clinical trial. Patients were assigned at
random to one of three treatment programmes: General Practitioner Programm
e (GPP-) controls, ManuaI Therapy Programme (MTP) or Intensive Training Pro
gramme (ITP).
Setting - Primary care and physiotherapists in Stockholm, Sweden.
Patients -180 patients sick-listed for acute LBP.
Main outcome measures - Direct, indirect and total costs for three treatmen
t programmes.
Results - The direct costs for treatment were lowest in the GPP group -2744
Swedish crowns (SEK) per patient. More patients in the MTP and ITP underwe
nt operations for disk hernia and radio- logical investigations than in the
GPP. Indirect costs, defined as sick-leave for LBP represent about 90% of
the total cost.
Conclusions - With respect to total costs, the findings were similar betwee
n the three treatment programmes. The GPP had the lowest direct costs. It i
s not possible to conclude which treatment programme is to be recommended a
s a least cost alternative. The strong effect of indirect costs an the tota
l cost stresses that further studies should focus on methods of shortening
sick-leave.