Anterior cervical foraminotomy for unilateral radicular disease

Citation
Jp. Johnson et al., Anterior cervical foraminotomy for unilateral radicular disease, SPINE, 25(8), 2000, pp. 905-909
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
SPINE
ISSN journal
03622436 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
905 - 909
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(20000415)25:8<905:ACFFUR>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Study Design. A clinical series of patients with unilateral radiculopathy t reated with the anterior cervical foraminotomy procedure. Objective. To establish procedural techniques and clinical and radiologic o utcomes for the anterior cervical foraminotomy procedure. Summary of Background Data. Cervical radiculopathy is typically caused by u nilateral disc herniation or unco-vertebral osteophytes that compress the v entral aspect of the nerve. Direct removal of a cervical lesion causing rad icular symptoms without concomitant fusion seems to be an ideal treatment i n selected patients. The indications for an anterior cervical neural forami notomy are limited to unilateral radicular symptoms at one or two levels, w ith minimal neck pain. Methods. Twenty-one patients were treated with the anterior cervical neural foraminotomy procedure during a 3-year period with follow-up from 6 to 36 months. There were 13 men and 8 women (age range, 27-58 years). Fourteen pa tients had symptomatic soft disc herniation, and 7 had uncovertebral osteop hytes confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and/or myelogram and computed tomography. Sixteen patients had a single anterior cervical neural foramin otomy, and 5 had procedures at adjacent levels. Results. Nineteen patients (91%) had improved or resolved radicular symptom s, and 2 (9%) had persistent radicular symptoms necessitating further surge ry (one two-level anterior cervical neural discectomy and fusion and one po sterior foraminal decompression). Conclusions. Patients Treated with the anterior cervical neural foraminotom y procedure have equivalent or better outcomes than those who undergo curre nt cervical procedures. It appears to be a good alternative procedure for c arefully selected patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy and avoid s a fusion of the disc space.