Rn. Natarajan et al., Anterior cervical fusion - A finite element model study on motion segment stability including the effect of osteoporosis, SPINE, 25(8), 2000, pp. 955-961
Study Design. Three-dimensional, nonlinear finite element models were used
to evaluate the stability of the mid cervical spine after anterior fusion i
n patients with and without osteoporosis.
Objectives. The objective of this study was to compare the change in flexib
ility of C5-C6 after anterior discectomy with both loose-fitting and tight-
fitting fusion graft.
Summary of Background Data. Many factors such as surgical technique, osteop
orosis, and excess neck motion during the postoperative period may contribu
te to fusion failure. Knowledge about changes in biomechanical properties a
fter the surgical procedure is important for selection of grafts with appro
priate strength and for guiding patients in postoperative care and rehabili
tation.
Methods. Analyses with anterior fusion models with both loose-fitting and t
ight-fitting graft were performed in a normal and an osteoporotic spine. Th
e motion of the C5 vertebra in relation to the C6 vertebra were calculated,
after multidirectional moment loads of 0.5 Nm combined with a compressive
preload of 105 N.
Results. Loose-fitting graft produced both an increase and a decrease in mo
tion under various external moment loads, with graft compressive stress bel
ow the compressive strength of the graft material. A reduction in motion wa
s observed under all moment loads when a tight-fitting graft was used. The
compressive stress in the tight-fitting graft was higher than the strength
of the graft material. Osteoporosis increased the principal motions with bo
th the loose-fitting graft and tight-fitting graft. Maximum increase in mot
ion with a loose-fitting graft construct was observed under extension and a
xial torsion moment loads.
Conclusions. Anterior discectomy and insertion of the loose graft resulted
in increased motion. A tight-fitting graft is beneficial in reducing motion
, but the stress within the graftincreases beyond the graft strength. The p
resence of osteoporosis was nominally significant when the graft was tight
fitting.