Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether laparoscopic
intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch (LIPP) rep
air of a ventral hernia is superior to open prefascial polypropylene mesh (
OPPM) repair in a tertiary care university hospital in an urban environment
.
Methods: Data on 39 consecutive patients undergoing either LIPP repair (n =
21) or OPPM repair (n = 18) were compared.
Results: Findings showed that LIPP repair is characterized by less painful
recovery and shorter hospital stay, with 90% of patients treated successful
ly as outpatients as compared with 7% in the OPPM group. The total facility
costs for the LIPP repair ($8,273 +/- $2,950) was significantly lower than
for the OPPM repair ($12,461 +/- $5,987) (p < 0.05). Two serious delayed c
omplications in the LIPP group were treated by reoperation (colocutaneous f
istula, mesh infection), but the higher readmission costs in this group did
not negate the overall cost advantage for LIPP repair. In the follow-up ev
aluation, 1 hernia recurrence was found in the LIPP repair group, and none
in the OPPM group.
Conclusions: Initial experience suggests that LIPP repair has advantages ov
er OPPM repair in terms of decreased hospitalization, postoperative pain, a
nd disability. Refinements in the technique to reduce complications may mak
e LIPP repair the procedure of choice for repair of ventral hernias.