A cued reaction time task was used to test the hypothesis that there i
s an 'object-based' component to shifts of attention mediating the det
ection of luminance increment targets. The test stimulus consisted of
two intersecting triangles forming a 'Star of David'. In two experimen
ts, the cue was a brief brightening of one triangle. The target (a bri
ght green dot) appeared on one of the triangles after a delay of 100,
200 or 500 msec. In one experiment, the target was more likely to appe
ar on the cued triangle. In a second experiment, there was no continge
ncy between cue and target. In both cases, reaction times to targets w
hich appeared outside (but not inside) the cued triangle were more tha
n 10 msec longer than other targets, but only al the shorter cue-targe
t delays. This indicates that the attentional system which regulates l
uminance increment detection cannot select the cued triangle. It appea
rs that the attentional spotlight can be briefly deformed into a trian
gular shape, and that it is the rapid, fast-decaying and reflexive exo
genous system, rather than the slower acting, persistent and voluntary
endogenous system, that mediates this effect. A third experiment usin
g a central, symbolic cue showed no significant cue-validity effects,
indicating no contribution from the endogenous system. It is concluded
that tasks requiring only stimulus detection cannot unequivocally dis
criminate between spatial and object-based components of attention. (C
) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.