Differentiation between true microembolic signals and artefacts using an arbitrary sample volume

Citation
D. Georgiadis et al., Differentiation between true microembolic signals and artefacts using an arbitrary sample volume, ULTRASOUN M, 26(3), 2000, pp. 493-496
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
03015629 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
493 - 496
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-5629(200003)26:3<493:DBTMSA>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
We evaluated a new discrimination technique between microemboli (MES) and a rtefact signals. Monitoring was performed over the middle cerebral artery ( 55 mm) and the brain parenchyma (29 mm), Intensity changes were expressed a s percent of change compared to the value measured in the proximal depth. T he cut-off value providing the highest sensitivity and specificity in the d ifferentiation was evaluated using 250 MES and 250 artefact signals, and su bsequently analysed in the first part of the study. Intensity values derive d from the distal depth were subsequently evaluated in 10 patients undergoi ng cardiac surgery and 45 patients with potential arterial or cardioembolic source. Intensity changes of 87% (84%-90%) and -58% (-71%--48%) were measu red in the initial 500 signals for MES and artefact signals, respectively, The best intensity cut-off value was calculated at 27%, This value was subs equently applied to a total of 1858 MES and 1958 artefacts, resulting to se nsitivity and specificity of 96% and 98%, respectively, The proposed techni que provided adequate results, warranting further evaluation. (C) 2000 Worl d Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.