Occurrence of chlorinated paraffins in beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) from the St. Lawrence River and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and carp (Cyprinus carpio) from Lake Ontario
Dt. Bennie et al., Occurrence of chlorinated paraffins in beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) from the St. Lawrence River and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and carp (Cyprinus carpio) from Lake Ontario, WAT QUAL RE, 35(2), 2000, pp. 263-281
Samples of 25 dead beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) from the St. Lawre
nce River estuary, as well as samples of 10 rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus myk
iss) and 3 carp (Cyprinus carpio) caught in western Lake Ontario were analy
zed for total short- (C-10-C-13) and medium-(C14C17) chain chlorinated para
ffins (SMCCPs) using gas chromatography-low resolution negative chemical io
nization mass spectrometry (GC-NCI-MS) in the selected ion monitoring mode
(SIM). Short- and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins were quantitatively id
entified using two commercial preparations. SMCCPs were detected in all sam
ples. Results ranged from 1.1 to 59 mu g/g wet weight in beluga liver tissu
e, from 6.4 to 166 mu g/g wet weight in beluga blubber, and from 0.41 to 9.
7 mu g/g wet weight in the two freshwater species. The beluga results are h
igher than those reported for marine mammals in Europe. Total short- and me
dium-chain chlorinated paraffin levels in the beluga blubber are comparable
to previous Sigma CPCB and Sigma DDT results for the same population of be
luga whales. The mean Sigma SMCCP concentration in the carp was 0.90 mu g/g
wet weight and 2.7 mu g/g wet weight in the rainbow trout. Results from th
e freshwater species are comparable to those reported for fish sampled from
other industrially impacted waterways in North America but are elevated re
lative to marine species from European studies. Comparison of the SIM GC-NC
I-MS data with results of gas chromatography-high resolution negative ion m
ass spectrometry (GC-HR-NIMS) analysis from another study showed that the t
wo analytical techniques are not congruent The differences may be due to th
e effects of coeluting interfering organochlorine substances.