Long-term outcome in patients treated by intracoronary stenting with ticlopidine and aspirin, and deleterious prognostic role of unstable angina pectoris
M. Angioi et al., Long-term outcome in patients treated by intracoronary stenting with ticlopidine and aspirin, and deleterious prognostic role of unstable angina pectoris, AM J CARD, 85(9), 2000, pp. 1065-1070
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Compared with stable clinical conditions, unstable angina carries an increa
sed risk of immediate and delayed cardiac adverse events after balloon coro
nary angioplasty. The influence of stent use in reducing these differences
remains unknown. We analyzed the early (30 days) and late outcome of a coho
rt of 459 consecutive patients who underwent stent placement with ticlopidi
ne and aspirin as antithrombotic regimen according to the presence (group 1
, n = 151) or absence (group 2, n = 308) of unstable angina at rest (Braunw
ald classes II and III). Group 1 patients were older and more likely to be
current or former smokers. In group 2, prior myocardial infarction was more
frequent. Procedural, in-hospital results, and early outcome were similar
in the 2 groups. However, over the long term, the incidence of myocardial i
nfarction (11% vs 6%, p <0.04), target lesion revascularization (19% vs 13%
, p <0.04), or any revascularization (30% vs 20%, p <0.01) was significantl
y higher in group 1. Kaplan-Meier probabilities of survival without myocard
ial infarction (85% vs 91%, p <0.05), survival without revascularization of
the target lesion (73% vs 83%, p <0.01), survival without any revasculariz
ation (65% vs 77%, p <0.006), and survival without any events (61% vs 73%,
p <0.009) were significantly worse in group 1. In addition, Cox multivariat
e analysis showed that unstable angina at rest was an independent predictor
of target lesion revascularization, of survival without any revascularizat
ion, and without any events. Thus, unstable angina at rest remains an adver
se prognostic indicator in patients treated with intracoronary stents, part
icularly with regard to subsequent requirement of revascularization procedu
res and event-free survival. (C) 2000 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.