B. Elvevag et al., Continuous performance test and schizophrenia: A test of stimulus-responsecompatibility, working memory, response readiness, or none of the above?, AM J PSYCHI, 157(5), 2000, pp. 772-780
Objective: Abnormalities of attention are considered the fundamental defici
ts in cognitive function manifested by patients with schizophrenia. The aut
hors administered variations of two types of cognitive tasks to patients wi
th schizophrenia (N=20) and normal comparison subjects (N=30) to test four
possible cognitive mechanisms that might account for such abnormalities.
Method: Variations of the Continuous Performance Test were used to test the
four mechanisms. Stimulus-response mapping was explored by comparing resul
ts on a task in which subjects were to make a response if the word "nine" w
as preceded by the word "one" with results on a task in which the required
response was made explicit by the stimulus (the word "ready" followed by th
e word "press"). The building up of a prepotent response tendency was teste
d by manipulating the probability with which the cue and imperative stimulu
s appeared (17% or 50%). The amount of working memory required to maintain
contextual information was tested by using different delay intervals (1000
msec and 3000 msec). The extent to which problems in vigilance might be att
ributable to problems in the "motoric" component of response readiness was
operationalized by having subjects perform a secondary motor task concurren
t with the attentional task.
Results: Patients with schizophrenia performed significantly worse than the
normal comparison subjects on all tasks. However, none of the four manipul
ations of the Continuous Performance Test tasks had a differential impact o
n the patients' performance speed or accuracy. In contrast, there was a sig
nificant interaction of group, delay interval, and target probability in wh
ich patients made disproportionately more omission errors at short delay in
tervals and at low target probabilities.
Conclusions: The findings may call into question the explanatory power of c
ertain well-known contemporary mechanistic accounts of performance on the C
ontinuous Performance Test in patients with schizophrenia. The findings sug
gest that a difficulty in rapidly encoding information (i.e., constructing
a representation) in certain "unengaging" situations may be at the core of
deficits on tasks associated with this attentional test.