Endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC) is a recently described entity,
defined as a noninvasive, cytologically malignant lesion Mat replaces the
endometrial surface epithelium. EIC frequently coexists with uterine serous
carcinoma (USC) and is hypothesized to be its precursor lesion. However, t
he clinical significance and biologic potential of finding EIC without USC
is not known. We report three postmenopausal women with EIC alone who were
found to have multiple, synchronous foci of extrauterine serous carcinoma a
t presentation. Because the clinical findings in these patients simulated p
rimary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PSC), we compared the clinicopathologic
features of these cases with a group of nine bona fide PSCs for which exha
ustively sectioned endometria, fallopian tubes, and ovaries were available
far review. The average age of the EIC patients was 73 years. Two patients
presented with abdominal distention and one with vaginal bleeding. Hysterec
tomy in each case showed endometrial polyps with EIC. but without invasive
USC, in a background of atrophic endometrium. Bilateral salpingo-oophorecto
my and staging showed serous carcinoma involving the ovarian hilum, the sur
faces of the fallopian tubes and ovaries, in addition to peritoneal carcino
matosis. p53 overexpression was observed in both EIC and the extrauterine d
eposits of serous carcinoma in each case. The average age of the PSC patien
ts was 66 years. All nine patients presented with abdominal distention. EIC
was not identified in any of the hysterectomy specimens. Bilateral salping
o-oophorectomies, omentectomies, and peritoneal biopsies showed peritoneal
carcinomatosis, including bulky peritoneal tumor deposits, but only minimal
ovarian surface involvement. p53 overexpression was observed in seven case
s. These findings indicate that EIC without coincident USC can be associate
d with invasive, extrauterine serous carcinomatosis. We did not, however, f
ind any significant differences between the clinicopathologic features of p
rimary extrauterine serous carcinomas (PSCs) and those associated with EIC.
We conclude that the finding of EIC in an endometrial curettage specimen s
hould prompt a thorough search for an invasive uterine and/or extrauterine
serous carcinoma. Conversely, an endometrial origin should be excluded in p
atients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.