U. Achleitner et al., The effects of repeated doses of vasopressin or epinephrine on ventricularfibrillation in a porcine model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ANESTH ANAL, 90(5), 2000, pp. 1067-1075
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
This study evaluated ventricular fibrillation mean frequency and amplitude
to predict defibrillation success in a porcine cardiopulmonary resuscitatio
n (CPR) model using repeated administration of vasopressin or epinephrine.
After 4 min of cardiac arrest and 3 min of CPR, 10 pigs were randomly assig
ned to receive either vasopressin (early vasopressin: 0.4, 0.4, and 0.8 uni
ts/kg, respectively, n = 5) or epinephrine (early epinephrine: 45, 45, and
200 mu g/kg, respectively, n = 5). Another 11 animals were randomly allocat
ed after 4 min of cardiac arrest and 8 min of CPR to receive every 5 min ei
ther vasopressin (late vasopressin: 0.4 and 0.8 units/kg, respectively, n =
5) or epinephrine Gate epinephrine: 45 and 200 mu g/kg, n = 6). Ventricula
r fibrillation mean frequency and amplitude on defibrillation were signific
antly higher in the vasopressin groups than in the epinephrine groups, resp
ectively. In vasopressin versus epinephrine animals, mean frequency immedia
tely before defibrillation was 9.6 +/- 1.5 Hz vs 7.0 +/- 0.7 Hz (P < 0.001)
, mean amplitude was 0.65 +/- 0.26 mV vs 0.21 +/- 0.14 mV (P < 0.001, and c
oronary perfusion pressure was 27 +/- 9 mm Hg vs 8 +/- 4 mm Hg (P < 0.00001
), respectively, in contrast to no epinephrine animals, all vasopressin ani
mals were successfully defibrillated and survived 1 h (P < 0.05). Mean fibr
illation frequency and amplitude predicted successful defibrillation and ma
y serve as noninvasive markers to monitor continuing CPR efforts. Furthermo
re, vasopressin was superior to epinephrine in maintaining these variables
above a threshold necessary for successful defibrillation.