Y. Arakane et al., Comparison of chitinase isozymes from yam tuber - Enzymatic factor controlling the lytic activity of chitinases, BIOS BIOT B, 64(4), 2000, pp. 723-730
To evaluate the anti-pathogen activity of chitinases, we developed a new me
thod for measuring the lytic activity, and investigated the correlation of
the lytic activity with the enzymatic properties by using four chitinase is
ozymes, Chitinases E, F, H1 and G, which had been purified from yam tubers
by column chromatography. Chitinases E, F and H1 had high lytic activity ag
ainst the plant pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum, but Chitinase G did not. Chit
inase E, which is the family 19 chitinase, was similar to Chitinases F and
G in its antigenecity, but not to Chitinase H1 or H2. Chitinases H1 and H2
were recognized by the anti-Bombyx mori chitinase antibody, suggesting that
Chitinases H1 and H2 are family 18 chitinases like B. mori chitinases. Chi
tinases E, F and H1 had two optimum pH ranges of 3-4 and 7.5-9 toward glyco
lchitin, but Chitinase G had only one optimum pH value of 5. Chitinases E,
F and H1 had higher affinity to the polymer substrate, glycolchitin, than C
hitinase G. These results suggest that the lytic activity of plant chitinas
es may be related to the chitin affinity and probably to the characteristic
optimum pH value, or two values, but not related to its classification. Th
e correlation of the lytic activity of a chitinase isozyme with its elicito
r specificity is also discussed.