Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry

Citation
Sm. Cadarette et al., Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry, CAN MED A J, 162(9), 2000, pp. 1289-1294
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
ISSN journal
08203946 → ACNP
Volume
162
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1289 - 1294
Database
ISI
SICI code
0820-3946(20000502)162:9<1289:DAVOTO>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Background: Although mass screening for osteoporosis is not recommended amo ng postmenopausal women, there is no consensus on which women should underg o testing for low bone mineral density. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a clinical tool to help clinicians identify which wome n are at increased risk for osteoporosis and should therefore undergo furth er testing with bone densitometry. Methods: Using Ontario baseline data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteopor osis Study, we identified all cognitively normal women aged 45 years or mor e who had undergone testing with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at both the femoral neck and the lumbar spine (L1-L4). Participants who had a previous diagnosis of osteoporosis or were taking bone active medication ot her than ovarian hormones were excluded. The main outcome measure was low b one mineral density (T score of 2 or more standard deviations below the mea n: for young Canadian women) at either the femoral neck or the lumbar spine . Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to identify the simplest algorithm that would identify w omen at increased risk for low bone mineral density. Results: The study population comprised 1376 women, of whom 926 were alloca ted to the development of the tool and 450 to its validation. A simple algo rithm based on age, weight and current estrogen use (yes or no) was develop ed. Validation of this 3-item Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument (ORAI ) showed that the tool had a sensitivity of 93.3% (95% confidence interval ICI] 86.3%-97.0%) and a specificity of 46.4% (95% CI 41.0%-51.8%) for selec ting women with low bone mineral density. The sensitivity of the instrument for selecting women with osteoporosis was 94.4% (95% CI 83.7%-98.6%), Use of the ORAI represented a 38.7% reduction in DXA testing compared with scre ening all women in our study. Interpretation: The ORAI accurately identifies the vast majority of women l ikely to have low bone mineral density and is effective in substantially de creasing the need for all women to undergo DXA testing.