Sm. Cadarette et al., Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry, CAN MED A J, 162(9), 2000, pp. 1289-1294
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Although mass screening for osteoporosis is not recommended amo
ng postmenopausal women, there is no consensus on which women should underg
o testing for low bone mineral density. The objective of this study was to
develop and validate a clinical tool to help clinicians identify which wome
n are at increased risk for osteoporosis and should therefore undergo furth
er testing with bone densitometry.
Methods: Using Ontario baseline data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteopor
osis Study, we identified all cognitively normal women aged 45 years or mor
e who had undergone testing with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at
both the femoral neck and the lumbar spine (L1-L4). Participants who had a
previous diagnosis of osteoporosis or were taking bone active medication ot
her than ovarian hormones were excluded. The main outcome measure was low b
one mineral density (T score of 2 or more standard deviations below the mea
n: for young Canadian women) at either the femoral neck or the lumbar spine
. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC)
analysis were used to identify the simplest algorithm that would identify w
omen at increased risk for low bone mineral density.
Results: The study population comprised 1376 women, of whom 926 were alloca
ted to the development of the tool and 450 to its validation. A simple algo
rithm based on age, weight and current estrogen use (yes or no) was develop
ed. Validation of this 3-item Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument (ORAI
) showed that the tool had a sensitivity of 93.3% (95% confidence interval
ICI] 86.3%-97.0%) and a specificity of 46.4% (95% CI 41.0%-51.8%) for selec
ting women with low bone mineral density. The sensitivity of the instrument
for selecting women with osteoporosis was 94.4% (95% CI 83.7%-98.6%), Use
of the ORAI represented a 38.7% reduction in DXA testing compared with scre
ening all women in our study.
Interpretation: The ORAI accurately identifies the vast majority of women l
ikely to have low bone mineral density and is effective in substantially de
creasing the need for all women to undergo DXA testing.