Evolution of the volume-outcome relation for hospitals performing coronaryangioplasty

Authors
Citation
V. Ho, Evolution of the volume-outcome relation for hospitals performing coronaryangioplasty, CIRCULATION, 101(15), 2000, pp. 1806-1811
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
CIRCULATION
ISSN journal
00097322 → ACNP
Volume
101
Issue
15
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1806 - 1811
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-7322(20000418)101:15<1806:EOTVRF>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Background-Hospitals performing more surgical procedures tend to yield bett er outcomes. This study examines the evolution of this volume-outcome relat ion over time. Methods and Results-The relation between the number of percutaneous translu minal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures performed at hospitals (volume ) and in-hospital bypass surgery and death for 353 488 patients treated in California between 1984 and 1996 was examined. Descriptive statistics and l ogistic regression were used to compare outcomes for 3 periods: 1984 to 198 7, 1988 to 1992, and 1993 to 1996. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.5% for hospitals performing <200 PTCA procedures per year but only 1.3% for ho spitals performing >400 procedures per year in 1984 to 1987. By 1993 to 199 6, mortality rates in these 2 volume categories narrowed to 1.7% and 1.3%, respectively. Bypass surgery rates also narrowed and fell in low-volume (<2 00 procedures) versus high-volume (>400 procedures) hospitals from 12.4% ve rsus 6.9% in 1984 to 1987 to 4.6% versus 3.3% in 1993 to 1996, In a logisti c regression, PTCA procedures significantly predicted in-hospital mortality and bypass surgery rates in all 3 time periods. However, coefficient estim ates indicate that improvements over time in outcomes for hospitals perform ing <200 procedures were comparable to the predicted benefits of increasing volume above 400 procedures within time periods. Conclusions-Over time, the disparity in outcomes between low- and high-volu me hospitals has narrowed, and outcomes have improved significantly for all hospitals. Given these improvements, lower minimum volume standards may be advisable in less populated areas, where the alternative is no angioplasty at all.