When agricultural researchers construct figures or graphs displaying sample
means from an experiment, a popular technique to display the relative vari
ation is to include standard error bars. This technique can be very informa
tive but misleading. Researchers will sometimes try to draw inference to th
e equality of their means by using these standard error bars. This paper ex
plores the use of standard error bars in comparing population parameters an
d exhibits how conclusions drawn by this method will often be faulty. The u
se of confidence intervals to test hypotheses is also presented. Some simpl
e mathematical derivations are presented, along with a small computer simul
ation study. If a researcher utilizes standard error bars in an attempt to
test a hypothesis, he or she will be performing a test with an approximate
type I error rate of alpha=0.16. In situations in which it is difficult to
perform a test, but confidence intervals are available, an alternative for
performing alpha=0.05 test is to evaluate 85% confidence intervals and reje
ct the hypothesis that the parameters are equal if the intervals fail to ov
erlap.