Hm. Hamer et al., Risk factors for unsuccessful testing during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure in preadolescent children, EPILEPSIA, 41(5), 2000, pp. 554-563
Purpose: Identification of risk factors for unsuccessful testing during int
racarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) in preadolescent children.
Methods: A pediatric IAP protocol was attempted in 42 candidates for epilep
sy surgery (5-12 years old; mean, 10 years) based on the ability to pass a
practice test. Language dominance was defined by marked asymmetry until fir
st verbal response and paraphasic errors. Intact hemispheric memory was def
ined by recall of greater than or equal to 60% of test items. The odds rati
os of baseline variables (age at IAP, Full-Scale IQ, side of disease, age a
t seizure onset, amobarbital dose) were calculated for various LAP outcomes
.
Results: IAPs were accomplished in 40 children. Language dominance was esta
blished in 25 (62.5%) of 40 patients: all 21 focal resection candidates wer
e left language dominant; four hemispherectomy candidates had intact langua
ge after injection of the damaged hemisphere. In 12 (30%) of 40 patients, l
anguage testing failed because of agitation or obtundation. Compared with t
he 21 children with language dominance established by bilateral ZAP, these
12 children had lower mean Full-Scale IQ (66.4 vs. 87.9; p = 0.014), and mo
re frequently, the epileptogenic lesion in the left hemisphere (presumed do
minant by right-handedness; 78 vs. 33%; p = 0.04). Excluding hemispherectom
y candidates (intentionally only one injection), memory testing could not b
e completed in 13 (36%) of 36 children because of obtundation or agitation.
These children were significantly younger than the 23 (64%) of 36 with suc
cessful bilateral memory testing (mean age, 107.6 vs. 128.7 months; p = 0.0
06). The eight (25%) of 32 children with failing retention scores after ips
ilateral injection had lower Full-Scale IQ than did the 24 (75%) patients w
ho passed (mean, 59.6 vs. 81.7 months; p = 0.03).
Conclusions; The IAP successfully established hemispheric language dominanc
e and memory representation for just under two thirds of the preselected pr
eadolescent children. Risk factors for unsuccessful tasting included low Fu
ll-Scale IQ (especially <80), young age (especially <10 years), and seizure
s arising from the left hemisphere presumed dominant by right-handedness.