We have previously shown that subgroups can be selected from large groups o
f amygdala kindled Wistar rats which either respond consistently or do not
respond to the anticonvulsant effect of phenytoin. Phenytoin nonresponders
were proposed as a model for pharmaco-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy. In
the present study we examined whether the differences of individual rats in
response to phenytoin are already present before kindling or are a consequ
ence of kindling. For this purpose, 52 rats were once tested with phenytoin
, then kindled, and then repeatedly tested with phenytoin for selection of
subgroups. For subgroup selection after kindling, the phenytoin prodrug fos
phenytoin was used because of its water solubility and its improved tolerab
ility and absorption after i.p. administration in rats. Before kindling, ph
enytoin significantly increased the afterdischarge threshold (ADT), i.e. a
sensitive measure of focal seizure activity, but there was large individual
variation with only 32 of the 52 rats reacting with an ADT increase, while
the remaining rats showed either no effect or ADT decreases. After kindlin
g, the selection resulted in 16 rats with consistent ADT increases in respo
nse to phenytoin and ten nonresponders (the remaining 26 rats showed variab
le responses). Unexpectedly, in rats which were responders after kindling,
phenytoin exerted no significant anticonvulsant effect before kindling, whi
le kindled nonresponders were very sensitive to phenytoin before kindling,
indicating that the kindling process was responsible for the loss of antico
nvulsant efficacy in kindled nonresponders and the development of phenytoin
's efficacy in kindled responders. The present results substantiate that ki
ndled subgroups of Wistar rats with different response to phenytoin are a v
aluable source for studying the mechanisms underlying the development of ph
armaco-resistant limbic seizures. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights
reserved.