Human nature and world politics: Cognition, identity, and influence

Citation
Pe. Tetlock et Jm. Goldgeier, Human nature and world politics: Cognition, identity, and influence, INT J PSYCO, 35(2), 2000, pp. 87-96
Citations number
80
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00207594 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
87 - 96
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-7594(200004)35:2<87:HNAWPC>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Many psychologists deem it self-evident that psychology can make fundamenta l contributions to our understanding of world politics. Many social scienti sts, however, argue that policymakers are rightly constrained by macro poli tical and economic forces. This article will advance a systemic approach to world politics that challenges: (a) psychologists by highlighting ways in which macro social structures may transform the character of "basic" intrap sychic processes; (b) anti-psychological theorists by showing that even the most sweepingly deterministic macro claims-for example, claims about the p ower of free trade to promote peace-rest on controversial assumptions about human nature. Systemic approaches to world politics are far more consisten t with how seasoned diplomats-from Dag Hammarskjold to Henry Kissinger-have historically approached geopolitical problems than are the traditional but increasingly obsolete micro and macro dualities that have dominated academ ic analyses.