Many psychologists deem it self-evident that psychology can make fundamenta
l contributions to our understanding of world politics. Many social scienti
sts, however, argue that policymakers are rightly constrained by macro poli
tical and economic forces. This article will advance a systemic approach to
world politics that challenges: (a) psychologists by highlighting ways in
which macro social structures may transform the character of "basic" intrap
sychic processes; (b) anti-psychological theorists by showing that even the
most sweepingly deterministic macro claims-for example, claims about the p
ower of free trade to promote peace-rest on controversial assumptions about
human nature. Systemic approaches to world politics are far more consisten
t with how seasoned diplomats-from Dag Hammarskjold to Henry Kissinger-have
historically approached geopolitical problems than are the traditional but
increasingly obsolete micro and macro dualities that have dominated academ
ic analyses.