Tj. Pentikainen et al., Cost-effectiveness of targeted screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm - Monte Carlo-based estimates, INT J TE A, 16(1), 2000, pp. 22-34
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
Objectives: This article reports a cost-effectiveness analysis of targeted
screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). A major emphasis was on the
estimation of distributions of costs and effectiveness.
Methods: We performed a Monte Carlo simulation using C programming language
in a PC environment. Data on survival and costs, and a majority of screeni
ng probabilities, were from our own empirical studies. Natural history data
were based on the literature.
Results: Each screened male gained 0.07 life-years at an incremental cost o
f FIM 3,300. The expected values differed from zero very significantly. For
females, expected gains were 0.02 life-years at an incremental cost of FIM
1,100, which was not statistically significant. Cost-effectiveness ratios
and their 95% confidence intervals were FIM 48,000 (27,000-121,000) and 54,
000 (22,000-infinity) for males and females, respectively. Sensitivity anal
ysis revealed that the results for mates were stable. Individual variation
in life-year gains was high.
Conclusions: Males seemed to benefit from targeted AAA screening, and the r
esults were stable. As far as the cost-effectiveness ratio is considered ac
ceptable, screening for males seemed to be justified. However, our assumpti
ons about growth and rupture behavior of AAAs might be improved with furthe
r clinical and epidemiological studies. As a point estimate, females benefi
ted in a similar manner, but the results were not statistically significant
. The evidence of this study did not justify screening of females.