A comparison of standard gamble, time trade-off, and adjusted time trade-off scores

Objective: To adjust patients' time trade-off (TTO) scores using informatio n on their utility functions for survival time to derive a measure of healt h state utility equivalent to the standard gamble (SG). Methods: A sample of 199 cardiovascular patients were asked three TTO and S G questions (to assess their own health state), and three certainty equival ent questions (to assess their utility function for survival time) in an in terview. Results: Patients' utility functions for time were increasingly concave, bu t being unable to model this successfully, a constant function with an aver aged level of concavity was used. The raw TTO scores were significantly hig her than SG scores, while the adjusted TTO scores were equivalent to the SG . Conclusions: Raw time trade-off scores will give biased estimates of health state utility when patients' utility functions for time are not linear, bu t these can be adjusted to yield true utilities. The constant proportional risk-posture assumption of the conventional QALY model, on which previous a ttempts to adjust time trade-offs have been based, was not supported by the data.