Disk recording beyond 100 Gb/in.(2): Hybrid recording? (invited)

Citation
Jjm. Ruigrok et al., Disk recording beyond 100 Gb/in.(2): Hybrid recording? (invited), J APPL PHYS, 87(9), 2000, pp. 5398-5403
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Apllied Physucs/Condensed Matter/Materiales Science
Journal title
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
ISSN journal
00218979 → ACNP
Volume
87
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Part
2
Pages
5398 - 5403
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8979(20000501)87:9<5398:DRB1GH>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
A new method for recording above 100 Gb/in.(2) is discussed. We call this m ethod "hybrid recording," a form of thermally-assisted recording that combi nes thermo-magnetic writing and magnetic reading. In order to increase the stability of the recorded information, writing is carried out at an elevate d temperature on a medium with a very high coercivity at room temperature. In our proposal write and read heads with extremely narrow trackwidths are used, so the trackwidth is not determined by the optical spot size and the written bits have a rectangular shape, in contrast to the schemes proposed by others. Preliminary experiments are shown. The applicability of today's granular and MO type media for hybrid recording is discussed. It is calcula ted that hybrid recording on optimized media can give an increase of the ar eal density of a factor 2.9 in areal density or 7 dB (2.2x) medium SNR impr ovement in case of Poisson noise and 11 dB (3.4x) in case of transition noi se. Practically a factor of about 2 in density is more realistic, pushing l imiting densities for longitudinal recording to 100-200 Gb/in.(2). Typical limitations at very high densities arise from heat dissipation in the head and thermal instability of the medium. Based on simplified model calculatio ns including realistic limitations on medium, head and leads, and today's p ractical limitations on electronics, comparisons are made between read head s containing a tunnel junction magnetoresistive (TMR) element and containin g a giant magnetoresistive element with sense current in the plane (CIP-GMR ) or perpendicular to the plane (CPP-GMR) of the sensor films. They show th at the signal-to-noise ratio of TMR sensors for areal densities above 15 Gb /in.(2) is not advantageous over GMR sensors with sense current in the plan e as long as the junction's tunnel resistance is not drastically reduced to below 10 Omega mu m(2). The CPP-GMR heads are disadvantageous with respect to CIP-GMR heads until the highest densities, 300 Gb/in.(2), considered. ( C) 2000 American Institute of Physics. [S0021-8979(00)85108-7].