A. Fassas et al., Autologous stem cell transplantation in progressive multiple sclerosis - An interim analysis of efficacy, J CLIN IMM, 20(1), 2000, pp. 24-30
Based on the good results of experimental transplantation in animal models
of multiple sclerosis and of other autoimmune diseases. we have treated 24
patients suffering from chronic progressive multiple sclerosis with high-do
se chemotherapy (BEAM regimen) followed by autologous blood stem cell rescu
e and antithymocyte globulin. Blood stem cells were mobilised with cyclopho
sphamide at 4g/m(2) and G- (or GM-) CSF. In 9 cases, additional CD34(+) cel
l-selection of the graft was performed. Hen we update previously published
results of this novel treatment, mainly with regard to clinical efficacy, a
s the median follow-up time has reached 40 months (range, 21-51). Infection
s were the principal toxicity early after the procedure, with death of a pa
tient from aspergillosis 65 days post stem cell infusion. No serious late e
vents occurred apart from a case of autoimmune thyroiditis that developed 1
1 months after transplant in a patient who had received a CD34(+) cell-depl
eted graft. Mild and transient neurotoxicity was observed in 10 patients (4
2%), most probably associated with fever and infections. Eighteen patients
(18/23; 78%) responded to the treatment. i.e., they were improved or stabil
ized, while live patients progressed, of which 4 had primary progressive di
sease. Of those improved or stabilised (18), 9 patients have maintained sta
ble condition whereas 9 developed relapses or they slowly resumed progressi
on, although their disability scores have not gotten worse than they were b
efore transplantation. The probability of progression-free survival (compar
ed to entry status) at 3 years is 92% for patients with secondary progressi
ve disease and 39% for the primary progressive type. CD34(+) cell-selection
did not seem to yield better results except for a delay in progression or
in relapse after transplantation. These results appear better than those ac
hieved by any other treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis, including
beta-interferon, but they need to be confirmed by other open or controlled
studies in view of the well-known difficulty of judging objectively the eff
ect of a treatment in patients with this disease.