Plant hydraulic conductance measured by the high pressure flow meter in crop plants

Citation
M. Tsuda et Mt. Tyree, Plant hydraulic conductance measured by the high pressure flow meter in crop plants, J EXP BOT, 51(345), 2000, pp. 823-828
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences","Animal & Plant Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
ISSN journal
00220957 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
345
Year of publication
2000
Pages
823 - 828
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0957(200004)51:345<823:PHCMBT>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
A new high pressure flow meter (HPFM) method for measuring plant hydraulic conductances (K) was investigated to examine whether its results are compar able to those from a conventional evaporative flux (EF) method in crops. Hy draulic conductance (K) was measured by the two methods under quasi-steady- state conditions in six crops grown in pots: soybean (Glycine max L. Merr. cv. Tsurunoko daizu), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv. Russian mammoth), kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Tsurunashi morocco), tomato (Lycope rsicon esculentum Mill. cv. Sekai-ichi), green pepper (Capsicum annuum L, c v, shishitou), and eggplant (Solanum melongena L, cv, Seiguro chunaga nasu) . There was a 1:1 agreement between K values measured by the two methods fo r K values of whole plant, root and stem, and leaf under quasi-steady-state conditions. Leaf water potential (Psi(leaf)) and evaporative flux density (E) in sunflower was curvilinear, indicating whole plant K estimated by the EF method increased with increase of E, Predicted Psi(leaf) (=E divided by whole plant K measured by the HPFM method) agreed with measured Psi(leaf). Diurnal changes were also found in K measured by the HPFM confirming that K changed in response to temperature and E. The HPFM revealed that variable conductance was located in all organs: roots, stems, petioles, and leaves. These observations indicated that the HPFM is valid for crops as well as f or trees (as previously established by Tsuda and Tyree) and has advantages over the EF method because of the speed and ease of the HPFM method.