Monitoring of head injury by myotatic reflex evaluation

Citation
Ja. Cozens et al., Monitoring of head injury by myotatic reflex evaluation, J NE NE PSY, 68(5), 2000, pp. 581-588
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY
ISSN journal
00223050 → ACNP
Volume
68
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
581 - 588
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3050(200005)68:5<581:MOHIBM>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Objectives-(l) To establish the feasibility of myotatic reflex measurement in patients with head injury. (2) To test the hypothesis that cerebral dysf unction after head injury causes myotatic refer abnormalities through disor dered descending control. These objectives arise from a proposal to use ref lex measurements in monitoring patients with head injury. Methods-The phasic stretch reflex of biceps brachii was elicited by a servo -positioned tendon hammer. Antagonist inhibition was evoked by vibration to the triceps. Using surface EMG, the amplitude of the unconditioned biceps reflex and percentage antagonist inhibition were measured. After standardis ation in 16 normal adult subjects, the technique was applied to 36 patients with head injury across the range of severity. Objective (1) was addressed by attempting a measurement on each patient without therapeutic paralysis; three patients were also measured under partial paralysis. Objective (2) w as addressed by preceding each of the 36 unparalysed measurements with an a ssessment of cerebral function using the Glasgow coma scale (GCS); rank cor relation was employed to test a null hypothesis that GCS and reflex indices are unrelated. Results-In normal subjects, unconditioned reflex amplitude exhibited a posi tive skew requiring logarithmic transformation. Antagonist inhibition had a prolonged time course suggesting presynaptic mechanisms; subsequent measur ements were standardised at 80 ms conditioning test interval (index termed "TI80"). Measurements were obtained on all patients, even under therapeutic paralysis (objective (1)). The unconditioned reflex was absent in most pat ients with GCS less than 5; otherwise it varied little across the patient g roup. TI80 fell progressively with lower GCS, although patients' individual GCS could not be inferred from single measurements. Both reflex indices co rrelated with GCS (p<0.01), thereby dismissing the null hypothesis (objecti ve (2)). Conclusion-Cerebral dysfunction in head injury is reflected in myotatic ref lex abnormalities which can be measured at the bedside. With greater reprod ucibility, reflex measurements may assist monitoring of patients with head injury.