Morphologic and biomechanical correlates with maximum bite forces in orthognathic surgery patients

Citation
Gs. Throckmorton et al., Morphologic and biomechanical correlates with maximum bite forces in orthognathic surgery patients, J ORAL MAX, 58(5), 2000, pp. 515-524
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
ISSN journal
02782391 → ACNP
Volume
58
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
515 - 524
Database
ISI
SICI code
0278-2391(200005)58:5<515:MABCWM>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine which factors of cranio facial morphology best predict maximum bite forces and jaw muscle strength (based on [electromyogram] EMG/force slopes) in patients selected for vario us orthognathic surgical procedures. These factors were then compared for t heir ability to separate orthognathic surgery patients by their clinical di agnosis. Patients and Methods: Standard lateral cephalograms were taken of 121 ortho gnathic surgery patients (before treatment) and 80 control subjects to esta blish multivariate sagittal and biomechanical factors of craniofacial form. Maximum and submaximal bite forces were recorded at 8 tooth positions for each subject. EMG activity was recorded for 3 pairs of muscles (anterior te mporalis, posterior temporalis, and superficial masseter) during the isomet ric bites. The EMG and bite force measurements were used to calculate EMG/f orce slopes as a measure of jaw muscle strength. The study looked for signi ficant correlations between the morphologic factors and maximum bite force or jaw muscle strength. Results: Factor analysis determined 12 sagittal and 6 biomechanical factors . However, only 3 of the sagittal and 4 of the biomechanical factors were s ignificantly correlated with maximum bite force or jaw muscle strength. Fac tors reflecting jaw size were correlated with maximum bite forces and jaw m uscle strength but generally did not separate patient groups. The factor mo st strongly correlated with maximum bite forces separated patients by their relative difference between anterior and posterior facial height. The fact or for anteroposterior maxillomandibular discrepancies was not correlated w ith maximum bite force or jaw muscle strength. Conclusions: Many cephalometric measurements used to diagnose craniofacial deformities and to assign patients to particular orthognathic surgical proc edures are not correlated with maximum bite forces or jaw muscle strength. Only measurements reflecting relative differences between anterior and post erior facial height are both strongly correlated with maximum bite force an d reflect assignment of surgical procedures. (C) 2000 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.