Aldose reductase, an NADPH dependent oxidoreductase, has received considera
ble attention due to its possible link to diabetic and galactosemic complic
ations. It is known that the catalytic reaction involves a hydride shift fr
om NADPW and a proton transfer from a suitable proton donor to the carbonyl
group of the substrate. However, the details of the process are still uncl
ear. The present work explores the catalytic mechanism of the enzyme by usi
ng the semi-microscopic protein dipoles Langevin dipoles (PDLD/S) and the e
mpirical valence bond (EVB) methods. The pK(a) values of His-110 and Tyr-48
are evaluated to determine which of these two residues donates the proton
in the reaction. It is found that the free energy of protonation of His-110
in its protein site is similar to 9 kcal/mol and hence the pK(a) of this r
esidue is abnormally low. Consequently, His-110 is not protonated in the ac
tive site of aldose reductase. On the other hand, it is found that the pK(a
) of Tyr-48 is lowered to similar to 8.5 in the active site due to the stab
ilization by the unique local environment of the phenol group. We conclude
that Tyr-48 acts as the proton donor in the reduction of aldehydes by aldos
e reductase, while the neutral His-110 has a role in substrate binding duri
ng the catalysis. To obtain a quantitative picture of the energetics of dif
ferent feasible catalytic mechanisms in the protein we follow the EVE philo
sophy and calibrate the potential surface of the catalytic reaction in a so
lvent cage by using the relevant energetics from experiments. It is found t
hat a mechanism where a proton transfer precedes the hydride transfer is un
favorable in the solvent cage, relative to the alternative mechanism where
the hydride transfer precedes protonation. Furthermore, our study of the re
action in the actual protein environment indicates that an initial proton t
ransfer step would require prohibitively high energy. Thus, the most probab
le catalytic mechanism commences with the hydride shift, followed by a prot
on transfer from Tyr-48. The calculations show that in water the activation
barrier for the hydride shift is similar to 20 kcal/mol, which is far abov
e the barrier of the subsequent proton transfer. The protein environment st
abilizes the transition state of the hydride shift by similar to 3 kcal/mol
and destabilizes the intermediate state by similar to 8 kcal/mol relative
to the corresponding states in the water cage. This finding is consistent w
ith the physiological role of the enzyme in detoxification where: it cataly
zes the reduction of a wide range of carbonyl-containing substrates without
particular specificity. It is argued that it may be difficult for an enzym
e to both satisfy this demand and catalyze the reaction beyond the simple r
ole of bringing the proton and hydride donor groups to the proximity of the
substrate.