Intravenous sotalol decreases transthoracic cardioversion energy requirement for chronic atrial fibrillation in humans: Assessment of the electrophysiological effects by biatrial basket electrodes
Lp. Lai et al., Intravenous sotalol decreases transthoracic cardioversion energy requirement for chronic atrial fibrillation in humans: Assessment of the electrophysiological effects by biatrial basket electrodes, J AM COL C, 35(6), 2000, pp. 1434-1441
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
OBJECTIVES This study was undertaken to assess the effects of sotalol on th
e transthoracic cardioversion energy requirement for chronic atrial fibrill
ation (AF) and on the atrial electrograms during AF recorded by two basket
electrodes.
BACKGROUND The effects of sotalol infusion on transthoracic electrical card
ioversion for chronic atrial fibrillation in humans have not been well inve
stigated.
METHODS We included 18 patients with persistent AF for more than three mont
hs. Atrial electrograms were recorded by two basket electrodes positioned i
n each atrium respectively Transthoracic cardioversion was performed before
and after sotalol 1.5 mg/kg IV infusion.
RESULTS In the 14 patients whose AF could be terminated by cardioversion be
fore sotalol infusion, the atrial defibrillation energy was significantly r
educed after sotalol infusion (236 +/- 74 jules UI vs. 186 +/- 77 J; p < 0.
01). Atrial fibrillation was refractory to cardioversion in four patients a
t baseline and was converted to sinus rhythm by cardioversion after sotalol
. infusion in two of them. We further divided the patients into two groups.
Group A consisted of 10 patients in whom the energy requirement was decrea
sed by sotalol while group B consisted of eight patients in whom the energy
requirement was not decreased. The mean A-A (atrial local electrogram) int
ervals during AF were significantly increased after sotatol infusion in bot
h groups, but the increment of A-A interval was significantly larger in gro
up A than it was in group B patients (36 +/- 13 ms vs. 22 +/- 8 ms for the
right atrium; 19 +/- 7 ms vs. 9 +/- 7 ms for the left atrium; both p < 0.05
). The spatial and temporal dispersions of A-A intervals were not significa
ntly changed after sotalol infusion in both atria in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS Sotalol decreases the atrial defibrillation energy requirement
by increasing atrial refractoriness but not by decreasing the dispersion of
refractoriness. (C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiology.