Using College of American Pathologists workload units for intralaboratory comparison

Citation
Al. Truant et al., Using College of American Pathologists workload units for intralaboratory comparison, LAB MED, 31(5), 2000, pp. 266-270
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology
Journal title
LABORATORY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00075027 → ACNP
Volume
31
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
266 - 270
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-5027(200005)31:5<266:UCOAPW>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
At Temple University Hospital, a 504-bed urban teaching hospital, lye have adapted the College of American Pathologists (CAP) workload units from the East published guidelines of the 1992 format to the 1998 Meditech Laborator y Information System MAGIC, version 4.6 (Westwood, MA). At our institution, the laboratory information system was interfaced with the hospital informa tion system-Eclipsys 7000 Series (Atlanta). CAP workload units were adapted for the clinical microbiology and immunology laboratories, which include b acteriology mycology, parasitology, mycobacteriology, virology, and microbi al immunology laboratories. All tests and procedures in the clinical microb iology and immunology laboratories were assigned workload unit values and w ere compared with workload unit values using the 1992 guidelines. Workload unit values for most procedures were incorporated directly into the Meditec h Laboratory Information System; values for general laboratory support proc edures such as quality control, phone calls, gowning, gloving, degloving, a nd of her general procedures were incorporated monthly. Databases such as t his can be quite useful in monitoring monthly workload trends, increases in workload due to laboratory mergers and acquisitions, and intralaboratory a nnual laboratory statistics.