Best evidence medical education (BEME) is an attempt to examine systematica
lly the quality of the evidence available to address educational issues, us
ing six dimensions: quality, utility, extent, strength, target and setting.
The present paper is a critical examination of some of the assumptions of
this method. Five basic points are made: (1) educational research is not ne
cessarily inferior to clinical research; (2) methodological rigour is not u
nidimensional; (3) educational interventions cannot be easily standardized;
(4) attempts to examine the strength and extent of evidence presuppose a s
ingle world-view; (5) however, despite these concerns, generalization is po
ssible for many questions.