D. Stevenson et al., Efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe dry eye disease - A dose-ranging, randomized trial, OPHTHALMOL, 107(5), 2000, pp. 967-974
Objective: To investigate the efficacy, safety, formulation tolerability, a
nd optimal dosing of a novel cyclosporin A oil-in-water emulsion formulatio
n for the treatment of moderate-to-severe dry eye disease.
Design: Randomized, multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group, dose-respon
se controlled trial.
Participants: Total enrollment: 162 patients; cyclosporin A groups: 129 pat
ients; vehicle group: 33 patients.
Intervention: Patients instilled study medication (cyclosporin A ophthalmic
emulsion 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2%, or 0.4%, or vehicle) twice daily into both eye
s for 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week posttreatment observation period.
Main Outcome Measures: Efficacy: rose bengal staining, superficial punctate
keratitis, Schirmer tear test, symptoms of ocular discomfort, and the Ocul
ar Surface Disease Index (OSDI; a measure of symptom frequency and impact o
n vision-related functioning). Safety: biomicroscopy, cyclosporin A blood l
evels, conjunctival microbiology, intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and
monitoring of adverse events.
Results: In a subset of 90 patients with moderate-to-severe keratoconjuncti
vitis sicca, the most significant improvements with cyclosporin A treatment
were in rose bengal staining, superficial punctate keratitis, sandy or gri
tty feeling, dryness, and itching, with improvements persisting into the po
sttreatment period in some treatment groups. There was also a decrease in O
SDI scores, indicating a decrease in the effect of ocular symptoms on patie
nts' daily lives. There was no clear dose-response relationship, but cyclos
porin A 0.1% produced the most consistent improvement in objective and subj
ective end points and cyclosporin A 0.05% gave the most consistent improvem
ent in patient symptoms. The vehicle also performed well, perhaps because o
f its long residence time on the ocular surface. There were no significant
adverse effects, no microbial overgrowth, and no increased risk of ocular i
nfection in any treatment group. The highest cyclosporin A blood concentrat
ion detected was 0.16 ng/ml. All treatments were well tolerated by patients
.
Conclusions: Cyclosporin A ophthalmic emulsions, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.4
%, were safe and well tolerated, significantly improved the ocular signs an
d symptoms of moderate-to-severe dry eye disease, and decreased the effect
of the disease on vision-related functioning. Cyclosporin A 0.05% and 0.1%
were deemed the most appropriate formulations for future clinical studies b
ecause no additional benefits were observed with the higher concentrations.
(C) 2000 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.