Objective: Because Visual pathway lesions are a common complication of pitu
itary tumors, visual field examinations in patients with acromegaly were st
udied. Proportion and outcome of visual field defects in patients with acro
megaly were evaluated.
Design: Large, retrospective case series.
Participants: We reviewed 307 cases of acromegaly seen from 1951 through 19
96 at a single referral center.
Methods: Kinetic visual field testing had been performed with the Goldmann
perimeter, and the frequency of visual field defects and their correlation
with other clinical manifestations and characteristics of the adenoma were
examined.
Main Outcome Measures: Repeat visual field examinations.
Results: Of the 307 patients included in the analysis, a visual field defec
t that could be attributed to the pituitary adenoma was observed in 62 (20.
2%) during follow-up. Visual field defects were bilateral in 38 (61.3%) of
these cases. Patients with visual field abnormalities were significantly yo
unger (P = 0.04), had larger tumors (P < 0.001), had more suprasellar exten
sions (P ( 0.001), and had higher levels of growth hormone in their serum (
P = 0.04) than patients free of visual field defects. At the end of the fol
low-up period, visual field examination remained abnormal in 32 (10.4%). Re
turn to a normal visual field examination after treatment was more frequent
ly observed in patients who were less than 40 years of age at the time of d
iagnosis (P = 0.004), Secondary empty sella syndrome was the main cause of
visual field defects after treatment. Abnormal visual field, either at the
time of diagnosis or during follow-up, decreased from 27% of patients betwe
en 1951 and 1975 to 15.4% of patients between 1976 and 1996, when modern ne
uroimaging techniques became available.
Conclusions: Endocrinologic and neuroimaging follow-up of patients with acr
omegaly should be accompanied by ophthalmic assessment. Factors predictive
of visual field defects have been identified. (C) 2000 by the American Acad
emy of Ophthalmology.