R. Garrido et al., CEFMINOX VERSUS CEFOXITIN IN HYSTERECTOMY PROPHYLAXIS - CLINICAL EFFICACY AND SERUM AND TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS, Clinical drug investigation, 13(6), 1997, pp. 317-325
This phase III, prospective, randomised, open, controlled clinical tri
al compared the efficacy of single-dose cefminox (2g) versus triple-do
se cefoxitin (2g every 4 hours) as antibiotic prophylaxis in 112 women
undergoing gynaecological surgery (vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy)
. Peak, intraoperative and trough serum concentrations were determined
for both antibiotics, as well as their concentrations in myometrial t
issue in a subset of patients from the study (22 patients from the cef
minox group and 18 from the cefoxitin group). Clinical response was sa
tisfactory in all women treated with cefminox (59 of 59) and in 52 of
53 patients treated with cefoxitin. Fever-related morbidity, hospital
stay and adverse reactions were similar in both groups. Peak serum con
centrations were 132.3 mg/L for cefminox and 82.2 mg/L for cefoxitin.
12-hour concentrations were 2.82 mg/L for cefminox and 2.17 mg/L for c
efoxitin, and were higher than the respective minimum inhibitory conce
ntrations (MICs) for pathogens commonly associated with this pathology
. Uterine tissue concentrations were 24.5 and 41.6 mg/L for cefminox a
nd cefoxitin, respectively, and also clearly exceeded MIG. It was show
n that the use of a single preoperative dose of cefminox was similar i
n efficacy to 3 doses of cefoxitin administered every 4 hours, and tha
t the serum and tissue concentrations attained provide adequate antibi
otic coverage. In view of the general trend towards the use of a singl
e dose for prophylaxis, cefminox offers a new alternative fur antibiot
ic prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery.