Yx. Wang et al., Do plasma and urine trypsinogen activation peptides (TAP) really increase in trypsin-taurocholate-induced pancreatitis?, PANCREAS, 20(4), 2000, pp. 389-393
Plasma and urine levels of trypsinogen activation peptides (TAP) reflect th
e severity of acute pancreatitis in experimental and clinical acute pancrea
titis. In trypsin taurocholate-induced pancreatitis in rats, the extrinsic
bovine trypsin used for the induction of pancreatitis might influence on th
e TAP levels after induction of pancreatitis. The aim of the present study
was to elucidate whether infused trypsin itself affects TAP levels in tryps
in-taurocholate-induced pancreatitis. Rats were divided into three groups.
In the pancreatitis group, acute pancreatitis was induced by a retrograde i
nfusion of bovine trypsin and sodium taurocholate into the pancreatic duct.
In the duct infusion group and peritoneal injection group, a mixture of bo
vine trypsin and trypsin inhibitor, ONO-3403, was infused into the pancreat
ic duct or the peritoneal cavity. Plasma and urine TAP concentration signif
icantly increased in trypsin-taurocholate-induced pancreatitis but not in t
he duct infusion and peritoneal injection groups for 6 hours after the infu
sion of trypsin. Serum rat immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) and amylase signifi
cantly increased in the pancreatitis and duct infusion groups but not in th
e peritoneal injection group. Serum levels of bovine IRT in the pancreatiti
s group was significantly lower than those in duct infusion and peritoneal
injection groups. In conclusion, an intraductal infusion of bovine trypsin
itself into pancreatic duct does not influence the levels of plasma and uri
ne TAP in trypsin-taurocholate-induced pancreatitis.