W. Ickes et al., On the difficulty of distinguishing "good" and "poor" perceivers: A socialrelations analysis of empathic accuracy data, PERS RELATI, 7(2), 2000, pp. 219-234
Two studies were conducted to explore the reasons why replicable individual
-difference correlates of empathic accuracy have proved so difficult to fin
d. In Study I, we examined sources of variance in empathic accuracy data us
ing the Social Relations Model (Kenny, 1988, 1994; Kenny & Albright, 1987;
Malloy & Kenny, 1986). The results revealed substantial perceiver Variance
only in the type of research design in which a relatively large set of indi
vidual perceivers inferred the thoughts and feelings of the same set of tar
get persons. In Study 2, we found evidence that even in this apparently opt
imal type of research design, the significant individual-difference correla
tes of empathic accuracy were fewer and subject to more unexpected qualific
ations than the results of Davis and Kraus's (1997) meta-analysis would sug
gest. So far, the "best candidate" predictor of empathic accuracy appears t
o be Verbal intelligence, but it remains to be seen whether it and two othe
r recently proposed predictors of interpersonal accuracy will survive the t
est of replicability.