D. Chiappini et al., Comparability of haematology profile between QBC (R) Autoread (TM) Plus System and all electronic cell counting instrument (Coulter Counter STKS), SCHW MED WO, 130(15), 2000, pp. 545-550
Aim: To evaluate whether the QBC(R) Auto-read(TM) Plus System (QBC = Quanti
tative Buffy Coat analysis) is suitable for assessment of a complete blood
cell count.
Method: The QBC(R) Autoread(TM) Plus System is a method for determining a n
ine parameter haematology profile including a WBC differential count of cen
trifuged or capillary blood. It is based on electrico-optical linear measur
ements of the discrete layers of packed blood cells in a microhaematocrit t
ube. The study population included 55 healthy individuals and 920 patients.
A Coulter Counter STKS was used as a reference instrument.
Results: Of a total of 920 probes, 70 had to be excluded due to delayed ana
lysis. Out of 850 probes 5.6% were unreadable. Good precision was noted for
haemoglobin and haematocrit (CV 1% and 2.2% respectively), as opposed to t
he other parameters (CVs ranging from 10.5 to 16.6%). Good accuracy was see
n for haemoglobin and haematocrit (R-s 0.982 and 0.955, slope of linear reg
ression 1.0 and 0.99, y-distance 0.40 g/l and 0.56% respectively). In contr
ast, values for granulocytes and mononuclear cells (lymphocytes, monocytes)
were inaccurate (R-s each 0.650, slope 1.53 and 0.77, y-distance -0.76 10(
9)/l and -0.27 10(9)/l respectively). Particularly inaccurate values were s
een for leukocyte counts of children suffering from haematological diseases
and of children treated in the emergency unit (R-s 0.688 and 0.607, slope
1.09 and 1.43, y-distance -0.02 10(9)/l and -2.95 10(9)/l). In the whole st
udy population acceptable values were noted for platelet counts (R-s 0.833,
slope 1.20, y-distance -35.54 10(9)/l).
Conclusions: Based on the performance found in our study, the QBC Autoread
system cannot be widely recommended for assessment of a nine parameter haem
atology profile. It is suitable for measuring haemoglobin and haematocrit a
nd acceptable for platelets. It is not reliable for measurements of leukocy
tes and the differential count.